Hyperonyms
(has_hyperonym)
|
05770926-n:
the process of using your mind to consider something carefully
|
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
|
05772667-n:
the abstract separation of a whole into its constituent parts in order to study the parts and their relations
|
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
|
05773049-n:
a course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating a truth or falsehood; the methodical process of logical reasoning
|
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
|
05773923-n:
reasoning that involves the formation of conclusions from incomplete evidence
|
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
|
05774129-n:
reasoning from the general to the particular (or from cause to effect)
|
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
|
05774614-n:
the reasoning involved in drawing a conclusion or making a logical judgment on the basis of circumstantial evidence and prior conclusions rather than on the basis of direct observation
|
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
|
05775081-n:
the act of predicting (as by reasoning about the future)
|
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
|
05783658-n:
logical and methodical reasoning
|
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
|
05783768-n:
the reasoning involved when you assume the conclusion is true and reason backward to the evidence
|
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
|
05783940-n:
the combination of ideas into a complex whole
|
Related
(related_to)
|
00632627-v:
think logically
|
Glosses
(gloss)
|
01430111-a:
capable of or reflecting the capability for correct and valid reasoning
|
Glosses
(gloss)
|
01925708-a:
capable of thinking and expressing yourself in a clear and consistent manner
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
00023271-n:
the psychological result of perception and learning and reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
00034213-n:
any state or process known through the senses rather than by intuition or reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
00139126-a:
involving reasoning from facts or particulars to general principles or from effects to causes
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
00363744-r:
according to logical reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
00894738-v:
defend, explain, clear away, or make excuses for by reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
00944924-v:
conclude by reasoning; in logic
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
01296270-a:
of reasoning; proceeding from particular facts to a general conclusion
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
01297152-a:
of reasoning; proceeding from general premisses to a necessary and specific conclusion
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
01430111-a:
capable of or reflecting the capability for correct and valid reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
01431471-a:
obtained through intuition rather than from reasoning or observation
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
01944492-a:
based on sound reasoning or evidence
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
02747667-a:
of or relating to or based on an impression rather than on facts or reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
04784664-n:
correct and valid reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
04785669-n:
invalid or incorrect reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
04810727-n:
result of a fallacy or error in reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05664069-n:
a system of reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05773049-n:
a course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating a truth or falsehood; the methodical process of logical reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05773923-n:
reasoning that involves the formation of conclusions from incomplete evidence
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05774129-n:
reasoning from the general to the particular (or from cause to effect)
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05774415-n:
reasoning from detailed facts to general principles
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05774614-n:
the reasoning involved in drawing a conclusion or making a logical judgment on the basis of circumstantial evidence and prior conclusions rather than on the basis of direct observation
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05783658-n:
logical and methodical reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05783768-n:
the reasoning involved when you assume the conclusion is true and reason backward to the evidence
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05804136-n:
an estimate that combines reasoning with guessing
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05871618-n:
the principles that guide reasoning within a given field or situation
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05893916-n:
a misconception resulting from incorrect reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05895138-n:
a deliberately invalid argument displaying ingenuity in reasoning in the hope of deceiving someone
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05913538-n:
a basic generalization that is accepted as true and that can be used as a basis for reasoning or conduct
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
06017895-n:
the logical analysis of mathematical reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
06163548-n:
any formal system of reasoning that arrives at the truth by the exchange of logical arguments
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
06552116-n:
an opinion that agrees with the court's disposition of the case but is written to express a particular judge's reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
06753030-n:
the proposition arrived at by logical reasoning (such as the proposition that must follow from the major and minor premises of a syllogism)
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
06753299-n:
(logic) a proposition that is accepted as true in order to provide a basis for logical reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
06785840-n:
a paradoxical anecdote or a riddle that has no solution; used in Zen Buddhism to show the inadequacy of logical reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
07547219-n:
hatred of reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
09178821-n:
a motive that can be defended by reasoning or logical argument
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
09899929-n:
someone whose reasoning is subtle and often specious
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
10685123-n:
logician skilled in syllogistic reasoning
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
11038084-n:
German philosopher whose three stage process of dialectical reasoning was adopted by Karl Marx (1770-1831)
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
13501059-n:
(psychiatry) a defense mechanism that uses reasoning to block out emotional stress and conflict
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
14402184-n:
impaired ability to express ideas verbally; usually resulting from difficulties of reasoning (as in feeblemindedness or certain psychoses)
|
