Galnet - WordNet 3.0 do Galego

logo sli

Pescudas no Galnet

Galego | English

Versión:
Procurar variantes en 
ili-30-06653363-n CILI: i71444
WordNet Domains: factotum
SUMO Ontology: Law+
Basic Level Concept: 06652242-n prescript
Epinonyms: [1] jurisprudence
[1] jurisprudence |0,95|
[0] ili-30-06653363-n (category) |0,95|
Polaridade:
  positivo negativo
SentiWordNet: 0 0
ML-SentiCon: 0.25 0.25
Tempo:
  pasado presente futuro atemporal
TempoWordNet: 0 0 0 1

Explorar o ámbito terminolóxico en [Termonet]
CA Variantes
- regla_que_requereix_prova
Glosa
Principis del dret segons els quals qualsevol suposada qüestió sotmesa a una investigació en un judici es verifica o es refuta
EU Variantes
- arrasta
EN Variantes
- rule_of_evidence
Glosa
a rule of law whereby any alleged matter of fact that is submitted for investigation at a judicial trial is established or disproved
Relacións léxico-semánticas no WordNet vía ILI (21) - Amosar / Agochar gráfico:
Hyperonyms
(has_hyperonym)
06652242-n: prescribed guide for conduct or action
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
06653727-n: a rule of evidence requiring that to prove the content of a writing or recording or photograph the original is required
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
06653911-n: a rule of evidence whereby a person is barred from denying the truth of a fact that has already been settled
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
06654074-n: a rule that provides that otherwise admissible evidence cannot be used in a criminal trial if it was the result of illegal police conduct
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
06654275-n: a rule that once primary evidence is determined to have been illegally obtained any secondary evidence following from it may also not be used
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
06654490-n: a rule that declares not admissible as evidence any statement other than that by a witness
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
06654639-n: a rule that oral evidence cannot be used to contradict the terms of a written contract
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
06654791-n: a rule of evidence whereby the negligence of an alleged wrongdoer can be inferred from the fact that the accident happened
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
06735261-n: rule of evidence that covers words that are so closely associated with an occurrence that the words are considered part of the occurrence and as such their report does not violate the hearsay rule
Domain
(category)
08441203-n: the collection of rules imposed by authority
Glosses
(gloss)
00667424-v: prove to be false
Glosses
(gloss)
00687614-a: declared but not proved
Glosses
(gloss)
00878636-v: refer for judgment or consideration
Glosses
(gloss)
02752987-a: relating to the administration of justice or the function of a judge
Glosses
(gloss)
05800611-n: an inquiry into unfamiliar or questionable activities
Glosses
(gloss)
06784317-n: a disputed factual contention that is generally left for a jury to decide
Glosses
(gloss)
13968973-n: a state of order in which events conform to the law
Glosses
(rgloss)
06653727-n: a rule of evidence requiring that to prove the content of a writing or recording or photograph the original is required
Glosses
(rgloss)
06653911-n: a rule of evidence whereby a person is barred from denying the truth of a fact that has already been settled
Glosses
(rgloss)
06654791-n: a rule of evidence whereby the negligence of an alleged wrongdoer can be inferred from the fact that the accident happened
Glosses
(rgloss)
06735261-n: rule of evidence that covers words that are so closely associated with an occurrence that the words are considered part of the occurrence and as such their report does not violate the hearsay rule