Hyperonyms
(has_hyperonym)
|
06753299-n:
(logic) a proposition that is accepted as true in order to provide a basis for logical reasoning
|
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
|
06754184-n:
the premise of a syllogism that contains the major term (which is the predicate of the conclusion)
|
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
|
06754415-n:
the premise of a syllogism that contains the minor term (which is the subject of the conclusion)
|
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
|
06755454-n:
an unproved statement put forward as a premise in an argument
|
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
|
06755568-n:
an assumption on which rests the validity or effect of something else
|
Hyponyms
(has_hyponym)
|
06756111-n:
a postulated sequence of possible events
|
Related
(related_to)
|
00632236-v:
take to be the case or to be true; accept without verification or proof
|
Related
(related_to)
|
00717208-v:
take something as preexisting and given
|
Glosses
(gloss)
|
00632236-v:
take to be the case or to be true; accept without verification or proof
|
Glosses
(gloss)
|
02460502-a:
consistent with fact or reality; not false
|
Glosses
(gloss)
|
06722453-n:
a message that is stated or declared; a communication (oral or written) setting forth particulars or facts etc
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
00709205-n:
therapy based on the assumption that restoring health is best accomplished by manipulating the skeleton and muscles
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
01297152-a:
of reasoning; proceeding from general premisses to a necessary and specific conclusion
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
04810510-n:
illogicality as a consequence of having a conclusion that does not follow from the premisses
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05779116-n:
deductive reasoning in which a conclusion is derived from two premises
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05781663-n:
(logic) a conclusion that does not follow from the premises
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05819149-n:
a fact that logically justifies some premise or conclusion
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05894311-n:
the logical fallacy of using as a true premise a proposition that is yet to be proved
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
05894814-n:
the logical fallacy of assuming the conclusion in the premises; begging the question
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
06168152-n:
a sociological theory based on the premise that society comes before individuals
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
06739013-n:
(logic) statements that explain the explicandum; the explanatory premises
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
06754184-n:
the premise of a syllogism that contains the major term (which is the predicate of the conclusion)
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
06754415-n:
the premise of a syllogism that contains the minor term (which is the subject of the conclusion)
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
06754972-n:
the term in a syllogism that is common to both premises and excluded from the conclusion
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
06755454-n:
an unproved statement put forward as a premise in an argument
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
06755568-n:
an assumption on which rests the validity or effect of something else
|
Glosses
(rgloss)
|
07162194-n:
something proposed (such as a plan or assumption)
|
